Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 5 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJETT-V74I5P101 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I5P101Improvement Proposal to Increase the Availability of Napkin Production Machinery Through Planned Maintenance, IoT, and SMED
Carmen Cajusol, Judith Gamarra, Percy Castro-Rangel, José C. Alvarez, Duilio Aranda, Robert Lepore
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Jul 2025 | 02 Feb 2026 | 11 Mar 2026 | 30 May 2026 |
Citation :
Carmen Cajusol, Judith Gamarra, Percy Castro-Rangel, José C. Alvarez, Duilio Aranda, Robert Lepore, "Improvement Proposal to Increase the Availability of Napkin Production Machinery Through Planned Maintenance, IoT, and SMED," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1-16, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I5P101
Abstract
In recent years, the paper and cardboard industry has grown globally, with China and India leading production at approximately 30% and 15% of the global total, respectively. However, the situation in Peru is different, as the sector's contribution to GDP declined by 6.6% in 2023, and many factories barely utilized 11% of their installed capacity. Even so, demand for tissue paper increased, and the industry is expected to grow by 8.83% in 2024. The biggest obstacle for a local tissue paper producer is the low availability of their equipment, which reaches only 62.71%. Because maintenance is reactive, failures are addressed after they occur, causing constant interruptions and increasing costs. To change this scenario, a model was proposed that combines three strategies: SMED to reduce setup time, planned maintenance to prevent failures, and IoT sensors to monitor conditions in real time and act predictively. The model was validated using historical data and expert review, with availability as the key indicator. As a result of its implementation, availability improved to 86.02%, representing a gain of 23.31 percentage points. Economically, the impact of downtime decreased by 9.78%, and annual savings of S/ 5,251.95 are estimated thanks to fewer repairs, better use of spare parts, and increased productive hours. In short, combining lean techniques with Industry 4.0 tools can significantly improve plant performance, even in small- to medium-sized operations.
Keywords
Machine Availability, SMED, TPM, Industry 4.0, IoT.
References
[1] Di Shang et al., “Evaluating the Green
Development Level of Global Paper Industry from 2000-2030 based on a
Market-Extended LCA Model,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 380,
2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Min Dai et al., “Advancing Sustainability in
China’s Pulp and Paper Industry Requires Coordinated Raw Material Supply and
Waste Paper Management,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol.
198, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Gerald Kenechukwu Inyiama, and Sunday Ayoola Oke,
“Maintenance Downtime Evaluation in a Process Bottling Plant,” International
Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 229-248,
2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Ali Koohsari et al., “A Critical Investigation on
the Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability of EPB Machines: A Case
Study,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 21, pp. 1-16, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Paulo Marinho et al., “Selecting the Best Tools
and Framework to Evaluate Equipment Malfunctions and Improve the OEE in the
Cork Industry,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering and
Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 286-298, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Filip Hardt et al., “Innovative Approach to
Preventive Maintenance of Production Equipment based on a Modified TPM Methodology
for Industry 4.0,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 15, pp. 1-17, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Zhang Tian Xiang, and Jeng Feng Chin,
“Implementing Total Productive Maintenance in a Manufacturing Small or
Medium-Sized Enterprise,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management,
vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 152-175, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Roosefert Mohan, J. Preetha Roselyn, and R. Annie
Uthra, “LSTM based Artificial Intelligence Predictive Maintenance Technique for
Availability Rate and OEE Improvement in a TPM Implementing Plant Through
Industry 4.0 Transformation,” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering,
vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 763-798, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Jovana Nikolić, Marica Dašić, and Marko Đapan,
“Smed as an Indispensable Part of Lean Manufacturing in the Small and Medium
Enterprises,” International Journal for Quality Research, vol. 17, no. 1,
pp. 255-270, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
[10] Marcela
Malindzakova, Dusan Malindzak, and Patrik Garaj, “Implementation of the Single
Minute Exchange of Dies Method for Reducing Changeover Time in a Hygiene
Production Company,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering and
Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 243-252, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Maria Afonso,
Ana Teresa Gabriel, and Radu Godina, “Proposal of an Innovative Ergonomic SMED
Model in an Automotive Steel Springs Industrial Unit,” Advances in
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 1-12, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Rouhollah
Khakpour, Ahmad Ebrahimi, and Seyed-Mohammad Seyed-Hosseini, “SMED 4.0: A
Development of Single Minute Exchange of Die in the Era of Industry 4.0
Technologies to Improve Sustainability,” Journal of Manufacturing Technology
Management, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 568-589, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Marcello
Braglia, Francesco Di Paco, and Leonardo Marrazzini, “A New Lean Tool for
Efficiency Evaluation in SMED Projects,” The International Journal of
Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 127, no. 1-2, pp. 431-446, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Adefemi Adeodu,
Mukondeleli Grace Kanakana-Katumba, and Maladzhi Rendani, “Implementation of
Lean Six Sigma for Production Process Optimization in a Paper Production
Company,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 14, no.
3, pp. 661-680, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] David Mendes et
al., “Integrating TPM and Industry 4.0 to Increase the Availability of
Industrial Assets: A Case Study on a Conveyor Belt,” Processes, vol. 11,
no. 7, pp. 1-21, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Jarosław
Brodny, and Magdalena Tutak, “Applying Sensor‐based Information Systems to
Identify Unplanned Downtime in Mining Machinery Operation,” Sensors,
vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1-18, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Mirjana Pejić
Bach et al., “Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0 for the SMEs: A Decision
Support System Case Study using Open-Source Software,” Designs, vol. 7,
no. 4, pp. 1-23, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Sudhir Chaurey
et al., “A Review on the Identification of Total Productive Maintenance
Critical Success Factors for Effective Implementation in the Manufacturing
Sector,” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 29, no. 1,
pp. 114-135, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Irene Niyonambaza,
Marco Zennaro, and Alfred Uwitonze, “Predictive Maintenance (PdM) Structure
using Internet of Things (IoT) for Mechanical Equipment used into Hospitals in
Rwanda,” Future Internet, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1-23, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Mounia Achouch
et al., “On Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0: Overview, Models, and
Challenges,” Applied Science, vol. 12, no. 16, pp. 1-22, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Sinem
Buyuksaatci Kiris et al., “An Integrated Approach for Lean Production using
Simulation and Data Envelopment Analysis,” Annals of Operations Research,
vol. 320, no. 2, pp. 863-886, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Guilherme
Tortorella et al., “The Impact of Industry 4.0 on the Relationship Between TPM
and Maintenance Performance,” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,
vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 489-520, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Dilsad Guzel,
and Alireza Shahbazpour Asiabi, “Improvement Setup Time by using SMED and 5S
(an Application in SME),” International Journal of Scientific and Technology
Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3727-3732, 2020.
[Google Scholar]
[24] Ashutosh
Samadhiya, Rajat Agrawal, and Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, “Integrating Industry
4.0 and Total Productive Maintenance for Global Sustainability,” The TQM
Journal, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 24-50, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Matic Breznik,
Borut Buchmeister, and Nataša Vujica Herzog, “Assembly Line Optimization using
MTM Time Standard and Simulation Modeling-A Case Study,” Applied Sciences,
vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1-18, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Lalit K. Toke,
and Shyamkumar D. Kalpande, “An Assessment of Key Performance Indicators and
its Relationship for Implementation of Total Productive Maintenance in
Manufacturing Sector,” International Journal on Interactive Design and
Manufacturing, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1741-1753, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Elias Pagurko
et al., “Simulation and Process Improvements of a Golf Cart Manufacturing
Line,” 2024 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS),
Charlottesville, VA, USA, pp. 75-78, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Ramazan Şahin,
and Aycan Koloğlu, “A Case Study on Reducing Setup Time using SMED on a Turning
Line,” Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 60-71,
2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] A. Ojstersek,
A. Javernik, and B. Buchmeister, “Optimizing Smart Manufacturing Systems using
Digital Twin,” Advances in Production Engineering and Management, vol.
18, no. 4, pp. 475-485, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Xiaoli Liang et
al., “Sustainable Utilization of Pulp and Paper Wastewater,” Water, vol.
15, no. 23, pp. 1-17, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] K. Velmurugan,
S. Saravanasankar, and S. Bathrinath, “Smart Maintenance Management Approach:
Critical Review of Present Practices and Future Trends in SMEs 4.0,” Materials
Today: Proceedings, vol. 62, pp. 2988-2995, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] James Ryan
Fernandez et al., “Automation of Predictive Maintenance using Internet of
Things (IoT) Technology at University-based O and M Project,” International
Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 11, no. 7, pp.
332-336, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Ida Hector, and
Rukmani Panjanathan, “Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0: A Survey of
Planning Models and Machine Learning Techniques,” PeerJ Computer Science,
vol. 10, pp. 1-50, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Rajnish Rakholia et al.,
“Integrating AI and IoT for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0
Manufacturing Environments: A Practical Approach,” Information, vol. 16,
no. 9, pp. 1-14, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]