Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 5 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJETT-V74I5P109 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I5P109Classification of Cervical Carcinoma: Employing Traditional Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods Utilizing Feature Selection Algorithms
Proloy Kumar Mondal, Haewon Byeon
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb 2025 | 22 Sep 2025 | 28 Mar 2026 | 30 May 2026 |
Citation :
Proloy Kumar Mondal, Haewon Byeon, "Classification of Cervical Carcinoma: Employing Traditional Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods Utilizing Feature Selection Algorithms," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 138-147, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I5P109
Abstract
Set against the fact that Cervical Cancer (CC) is the second-highest cancer amongst women globally, the Pap smear is one of the most widely screened test systems today. The number of cases in Bangladesh is rising fast, an urgent problem. To address this problem, an increasing number of individuals and researchers are turning to Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) to process large amounts of data and produce insights that can be implemented. ML-powered methods for the early-stage prediction of critical illnesses such as cancer, kidney failure, and heart diseases are standard in healthcare today. The early detection of cervical cancer is a potential option for the prevention of this disease, which is a prevalent condition in females. We addressed this performance in a wrapper model with Metaheuristic Algorithms: Osprey Optimization Algorithm (OOA). Machine learning classifier for CC prediction in this paper, we used AdaBoost as the machine learning classifier for CC prediction. By keeping all the 36 features, we are getting with AdaBoost an accuracy of 96%, a precision of 97%, a recall of 98%, and an F1 score of around 98%. Also, we utilized the OOA algorithm to find a beneficial subset of features to assist in the important feature selection. An OOA method reduced the features from 36 to 7. These results demonstrate the possibility of early cervical cancer detection using a reduced feature set with retained prediction power. Critically, we produced an enumeration of essential features for cervical cancer derived from our optimization algorithm and addressed CPU time for cost-effectiveness.
Keywords
Cancer of the Cervical Region, Machine Learning, Metaheuristic Algorithm, AdaBoost Algorithm, Osprey Optimization Algorithm (OOA).
References
[1] Naif Al Mudawi, and
Abdulwahab Alazeb, “A Model for Predicting Cervical Cancer using Machine
Learning Algorithms,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1-19, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Cervical Cancer, World
Health Organization, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cervical-cancer
[3] Riham Alsmariy, Graham
Healy, and Hoda Abdelhafez, “Predicting Cervical Cancer using Machine Learning
Methods,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and
Applications, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 173-184, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Karl Ulrich Petry, “HPV and
Cervical Cancer,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory
Investigation, vol. 74, no. sup244, pp. 59-62, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Guglielmo Ronco et al.,
“Efficacy of HPV-based Screening for Prevention of Invasive Cervical Cancer:
Follow-Up of Four European Randomised Controlled Trials,” The Lancet,
vol. 383, no. 9916, pp. 524-532, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Talha Mahboob Alam et al.,
“Cervical Cancer Prediction Through Different Screening Methods using Data
Mining,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications,
vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 388-396, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Jiayi Lu, “Machine Learning
for Assisting Cervical Cancer Diagnosis: An Ensemble Approach,” Future
Generation Computer Systems, vol. 106, pp. 199-205, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] B. Nithya, and V. Ilango,
“Evaluation of Machine Learning based Optimized Feature Selection Approaches
and Classification Methods for Cervical Cancer Prediction,” SN Applied
Sciences, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1-16, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Laboni Akter et al.,
“Prediction of Cervical Cancer from Behavior Risk using Machine Learning
Techniques,” SN Computer Science, vol. 2, no. 3, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] F. Asadi, C. Salehnasab,
and L. Ajori, “Supervised Algorithms of Machine Learning for the Prediction of
Cervical Cancer,” Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering, vol.
10, no. 4, pp. 513-522, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Sujay Kumar Suman, and
Nishtha Hooda, “Predicting Risk of Cervical Cancer: A Case Study of Machine
Learning,” Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, vol. 22, no. 4,
pp. 689-696, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Ishrak Jahan Ratul et al.,
“Early Risk Prediction of Cervical Cancer: A Machine Learning Approach,” 2022
19th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics,
Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON),
Prachuap Khiri Khan, Thailand, pp. 1-4, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Mavra Mehmood et al.,
“Machine Learning Assisted Cervical Cancer Detection,” Frontiers in Public
Health, vol. 9, pp. 1-14, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Mohammed Alsalatie et al.,
“A New Weighted Deep Learning Feature using Particle Swarm and Ant Lion
Optimization for Cervical Cancer Diagnosis on Pap Smear Images,” Diagnostics,
vol. 13, no. 17, pp. 1-19, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Kelwin Fernandes, Jaime S.
Cardoso, and Jessica C. Fernandes, Cervical Cancer (Risk Factors), UCI Machine
Learning Repository, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/383/cervical+cancer+risk+factors
[16] Ruihu Wang, “Adaboost for
Feature Selection, Classification and its Relation with SVM, a Review,” Physics
Procedia, vol. 25, pp. 800-807, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Sancho Salcedo-Sanz et al.,
“Analysis, Characterization, Prediction and Attribution of Extreme Atmospheric
Events with Machine Learning: A Review,” arXiv preprint, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Huan Liu, and Lei Yu,
“Toward Integrating Feature Selection Algorithms for Classification and
Clustering,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol.
17, no. 4, pp. 491-502, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Mohammad Dehghani, and
Pavel Trojovský, “Osprey Optimization Algorithm: A New Bio-Inspired
Metaheuristic Algorithm for Solving Engineering Optimization Problems,” Frontiers
in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 1-43, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]