International Journal of Engineering
Trends and Technology

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 5 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJETT-V74I5P109 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I5P109

Classification of Cervical Carcinoma: Employing Traditional Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods Utilizing Feature Selection Algorithms


Proloy Kumar Mondal, Haewon Byeon

Received Revised Accepted Published
11 Feb 2025 22 Sep 2025 28 Mar 2026 30 May 2026

Citation :

Proloy Kumar Mondal, Haewon Byeon, "Classification of Cervical Carcinoma: Employing Traditional Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods Utilizing Feature Selection Algorithms," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 138-147, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I5P109

Abstract

Set against the fact that Cervical Cancer (CC) is the second-highest cancer amongst women globally, the Pap smear is one of the most widely screened test systems today. The number of cases in Bangladesh is rising fast, an urgent problem. To address this problem, an increasing number of individuals and researchers are turning to Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) to process large amounts of data and produce insights that can be implemented. ML-powered methods for the early-stage prediction of critical illnesses such as cancer, kidney failure, and heart diseases are standard in healthcare today. The early detection of cervical cancer is a potential option for the prevention of this disease, which is a prevalent condition in females. We addressed this performance in a wrapper model with Metaheuristic Algorithms: Osprey Optimization Algorithm (OOA). Machine learning classifier for CC prediction in this paper, we used AdaBoost as the machine learning classifier for CC prediction. By keeping all the 36 features, we are getting with AdaBoost an accuracy of 96%, a precision of 97%, a recall of 98%, and an F1 score of around 98%. Also, we utilized the OOA algorithm to find a beneficial subset of features to assist in the important feature selection. An OOA method reduced the features from 36 to 7. These results demonstrate the possibility of early cervical cancer detection using a reduced feature set with retained prediction power. Critically, we produced an enumeration of essential features for cervical cancer derived from our optimization algorithm and addressed CPU time for cost-effectiveness.

Keywords

Cancer of the Cervical Region, Machine Learning, Metaheuristic Algorithm, AdaBoost Algorithm, Osprey Optimization Algorithm (OOA).

References

[1] Naif Al Mudawi, and Abdulwahab Alazeb, “A Model for Predicting Cervical Cancer using Machine Learning Algorithms,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1-19, 2022.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[2] Cervical Cancer, World Health Organization, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cervical-cancer

[3] Riham Alsmariy, Graham Healy, and Hoda Abdelhafez, “Predicting Cervical Cancer using Machine Learning Methods,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 173-184, 2020.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[4] Karl Ulrich Petry, “HPV and Cervical Cancer,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, vol. 74, no. sup244, pp. 59-62, 2014.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[5] Guglielmo Ronco et al., “Efficacy of HPV-based Screening for Prevention of Invasive Cervical Cancer: Follow-Up of Four European Randomised Controlled Trials,” The Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9916, pp. 524-532, 2014.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[6] Talha Mahboob Alam et al., “Cervical Cancer Prediction Through Different Screening Methods using Data Mining,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 388-396, 2019.
[
Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[7] Jiayi Lu, “Machine Learning for Assisting Cervical Cancer Diagnosis: An Ensemble Approach,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 106, pp. 199-205, 2020.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[8] B. Nithya, and V. Ilango, “Evaluation of Machine Learning based Optimized Feature Selection Approaches and Classification Methods for Cervical Cancer Prediction,” SN Applied Sciences, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1-16, 2019.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[9] Laboni Akter et al., “Prediction of Cervical Cancer from Behavior Risk using Machine Learning Techniques,” SN Computer Science, vol. 2, no. 3, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[10] F. Asadi, C. Salehnasab, and L. Ajori, “Supervised Algorithms of Machine Learning for the Prediction of Cervical Cancer,” Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 513-522, 2020.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[11] Sujay Kumar Suman, and Nishtha Hooda, “Predicting Risk of Cervical Cancer: A Case Study of Machine Learning,” Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 689-696, 2019.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[12] Ishrak Jahan Ratul et al., “Early Risk Prediction of Cervical Cancer: A Machine Learning Approach,” 2022 19th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), Prachuap Khiri Khan, Thailand, pp. 1-4, 2022.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[13] Mavra Mehmood et al., “Machine Learning Assisted Cervical Cancer Detection,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 9, pp. 1-14, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[14] Mohammed Alsalatie et al., “A New Weighted Deep Learning Feature using Particle Swarm and Ant Lion Optimization for Cervical Cancer Diagnosis on Pap Smear Images,” Diagnostics, vol. 13, no. 17, pp. 1-19, 2023.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[15] Kelwin Fernandes, Jaime S. Cardoso, and Jessica C. Fernandes, Cervical Cancer (Risk Factors), UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/383/cervical+cancer+risk+factors

[16] Ruihu Wang, “Adaboost for Feature Selection, Classification and its Relation with SVM, a Review,” Physics Procedia, vol. 25, pp. 800-807, 2012.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[17] Sancho Salcedo-Sanz et al., “Analysis, Characterization, Prediction and Attribution of Extreme Atmospheric Events with Machine Learning: A Review,” arXiv preprint, 2022.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[18] Huan Liu, and Lei Yu, “Toward Integrating Feature Selection Algorithms for Classification and Clustering,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 491-502, 2005.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[19] Mohammad Dehghani, and Pavel Trojovský, “Osprey Optimization Algorithm: A New Bio-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithm for Solving Engineering Optimization Problems,” Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 1-43, 2023.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]