Investigating the Relationship Between Performance Evaluation Based on Innovation Management System Approach and Information Technology in the Spun Pile Manufacturing System to Improve Competitiveness in Indonesia
Investigating the Relationship Between Performance Evaluation Based on Innovation Management System Approach and Information Technology in the Spun Pile Manufacturing System to Improve Competitiveness in Indonesia |
||
 |
 |
|
| © 2024 by IJETT Journal | ||
| Volume-72 Issue-7 |
||
| Year of Publication : 2024 | ||
| Author : Steventh Chendra Minto Halim, Yusuf Latief, Ranti Hidayawanti |
||
| DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I7P135 | ||
How to Cite?
Steventh Chendra Minto Halim, Yusuf Latief, Ranti Hidayawanti, "Investigating the Relationship Between Performance Evaluation Based on Innovation Management System Approach and Information Technology in the Spun Pile Manufacturing System to Improve Competitiveness in Indonesia," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 319-329, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I7P135
Abstract
The recent high demand for Indonesian infrastructure development, the usage of precast concrete has increased. Based on the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (PUPR) information, the usage of precast concrete keeps increasing from 24 million tons in 2014 to 41.82 million tons in 2019. Based on the global competitiveness index and the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) index, Indonesia is still left far behind other countries in the region. Therefore, it is still needed to develop performance evaluation based on an innovation management system ISO 56002:2019 and information technology to improve competitiveness. The results of this research are the identification of existing performance evaluation and information technology activities, dimension and indicator of performance evaluation and information technology factors that influence competitiveness, and relationship model of the variables that influence competitiveness. Research samples are taken from the precast companies that produce spun piles in Indonesia. Data gathering is collected using observation, documentation, pilot survey, questionnaire, and expert interviews. Data analysis is analysed using qualitative methods with SPSS and expert judgment. The result showed that performance evaluation based on an innovation management system ISO 56002:2019 and information technology positively affect competitiveness, and performance evaluation based on an innovation management system ISO 56002:2019 and information technology mutually influence each other. This finding could hopefully help Indonesia's precast company to improve its competitiveness.
Keywords
Competitiveness, Information technology, Performance evaluation, Precast concrete, Spun pile.
References
[1] Kuncoro Wibowo, and Loeky Rono Pradopo, “Application of the Business Model to Waskita Beton Precast Tbk,” Journal of Accounting and Management, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 32-46, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Association of Indonesian Precast and Prestressed Companies (AP3I), AP3I Precast and Prestressed Concrete Capacity, AP3I. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ap3i-indonesia.org/
[3] Wika Beton, Annual Report 2020, PT Wijaya Karya Beton Tbk, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.idx.co.id/StaticData/NewsAndAnnouncement/ANNOUNCEMENTSTOCK/From_EREP/202105/e29df63d76_33d007dee2.pdf
[4] Ida Farida, and Doddy Setiawan, “Business Strategies and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Performance and Innovation,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 8, no. 3, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 56002:2019, Innovation Management — Innovation Management System — Guidance. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/68221.html
[6] Jianwen Wang et al., “Business Intelligence Ability to Enhance Organizational Performance and Performance Evaluation Capabilities by Improving Data Mining Systems for Competitive Advantage,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 59, no. 6, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Yuan Hsu Lin et al., “Balanced Scorecard Performance Evaluation in a Closed-Loop Hierarchical Model under Uncertainty,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 24, pp. 1022-1032, 20104.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Patdono Suwignjo et al., “Framework for Measuring Process Innovation Performance at Indonesian State-Owned Companies,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 8, no. 2, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Tidd Joseph, “A Review and Critical Assessment of the ISO56002 Innovation Management Systems Standard: Evidence and Limitations,” International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 25, no. 1, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] V. Alcácer, and V. Cruz-Machado, “Scanning the Industry 4.0: A Literature Review on Technologies for Manufacturing Systems,” Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 899-919, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] The Information Technology Association of America (ITAA). [Online]. Available: https://www.itaa.org/
[12] Dingjuan Wu, and Jianhua Zhu, “Technical Efficiency Evolution Model of the Integration of Information Technology and Manufacturing Technology,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2020, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Ahmed Mohammed Alghamdi et al., “Intelligence and Usability Empowerment of Smartphone Adaptive Features,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 1-15, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Yan Li, Chen Su, and Jianjun Zhu, “Comprehensive Review of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing: Hardware System, Physical Process, Monitoring, Property Characterization, Application and Future Prospects,” Results in Engineering, vol. 13, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] ISO and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), ISO/IEC 2382:2015, Information Technology — Vocabulary, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/63598.html
[16] Li Yang et al., “Adoption of Information and Digital Technologies for Sustainable Smart Manufacturing Systems for Industry 4.0 in Small, Medium, and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs),” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 188, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Muntaser Mohamed Nuttah et al., “Understanding Blockchain Applications in Industry 4.0: From Information Technology to Manufacturing and Operations Management,” Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 33, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Christoph Legat, and Birgit Vogel-Heuser, “A Configurable Partial-Order Planning Approach for Field Level Operation Strategies of PLC-based Industry 4.0 Automated Manufacturing Systems,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 66, pp. 128-144, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Ekawati Marlina, Achmad Nizar Hidayanto, and Betty Purwandari, “Towards a Model of Research Data Management Readiness in Indonesian Context: An Investigation of Factors and Indicators through the Fuzzy Delphi Method,” Library and Information Science Research, vol. 44, no. 1, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Ahmed Alenezi, Hany F. Atlam, and Gary B. Wills, “Experts Reviews of a Cloud Forensic Readiness Framework for Organizations,” Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 8, no. 11, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Yuqian Lu et al., “Outlook on Human-Centric Manufacturing towards Industry 5.0,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 62, pp. 612-627, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Mohd Ammar et al., “Improving Material Quality Management and Manufacturing Organizations System Through Industry 4.0 Technologies,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 45, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] David Afandy et al., “Improving Knowledge-Sharing Intentions: A Study in Indonesian Service Industries,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 1-11, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Ching-Cheng Shen, Chien-Chi Yeh, and Chun-Nan Lin, “Using the Perspective of Business Information Technology Technicians to Explore How Information Technology Affects Business Competitive Advantage,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 184, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Eirin Lodgaard, Hans Torvatn, and Johanne Sørumsbrenden, “Future Competence at Shopfloor in the Era of Industry 4.0 - A Case Study in Norwegian Industry,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 107, pp. 961-965, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Antonio Cimino et al., “Empowering Field Operators in Manufacturing: a Prospective Towards Industry 5.0,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 217, pp. 1948-1953, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Davide Berardi et al., “When Operation Technology Meets Information Technology: Challenges and Opportunities,” Future Internet, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1-16, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Sugiyono, Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods, Bandung: Alfabeta. 2001.
[Publisher Link]