Immune Based Optimal Multicast Routings in Vehicular Ad hoc Network

Immune Based Optimal Multicast Routings in Vehicular Ad hoc Network
  IJETT-book-cover           
  
© 2024 by IJETT Journal
Volume-72 Issue-6
Year of Publication : 2024
Author : Smita Rani Sahu, Biswajit Tripathy
DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I6P122

How to Cite?

Smita Rani Sahu, Biswajit Tripathy, "Immune Based Optimal Multicast Routings in Vehicular Ad hoc Network," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 219-227, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I6P122

Abstract
In this paper multicast routing plan has been solved using the Artificial Immune System (AIS) algorithm. VANET faces various issues due to their highly dynamic topology, including frequent movement and rapid changes, which can result in delays and data packet loss. Due to its highly dynamic and complex networks, it requires efficient multicast routing for Intelligent Traffic System (ITS) applications such as traffic control, collision avoidance, and emergency services. The proposed approach utilizes the clonal selection method for optimising the route selection process to ensure reliable and efficient data delivery along the shortest path. To tackle these issues, the current study deals with location-based routing protocols over other VANET routing protocols. These protocols utilise the geographical location information of vehicles to make routing decisions instead of predefined route entries.

Keywords
VANET, Multicast routing, Artificial immune system, Clonal selection, Greedy forwarding, Packet delivery rate.

References
[1] Mohamed Elhoseny, “Intelligent Firefly-Based Algorithm with Levy Distribution (FF-L) for Multicast Routing in Vehicular Communications,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 140, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Jinran Wu et al., “An Improved Firefly Algorithm for Global Continuous Optimization Problems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 149, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Baraa T. Sharef, Raed A. Alsaqour, and Mahamod Ismail, “Vehicular Communication Ad Hoc Routing Protocols: A Survey,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 40, pp. 363-396, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Rajesh Kumar, and Sahil Chhabra, “Efficient Routing in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks Using Firefly Optimization,” 2016 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), Coimbatore, India, pp. 1-6, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Syeda Sundus Zehra, Syed Muhammad Nabeel Mustafa, and Rehan Qureshi, “Comparing Artificial Bees Colony Algorithm and Firefly Algorithm to Achieve Optimization in Route Selection Processing Time in VANETs,” Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 159-164, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Christy Jackson Joshua, and Vijayakumar Varadarajan, “An Optimization Framework for Routing Protocols in VANETs: A MultiObjective Firefly Algorithm Approach,” Wireless Networks, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 5567-5576, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Ammara Anjum Khan et al., “A Hybrid-Fuzzy Logic Guided Genetic Algorithm (H-FLGA) Approach for Resource Optimization in 5G VANETs,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 6964-6974, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Ankit Temurnikar, Pushpneel Verma, and Gaurav Dhiman, “A PSO Enable Multi-Hop Clustering Algorithm for VANET,” International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research (IJSIR), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1-14, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Ghassan Samara, Tareq Alhmiedat, and Amer O. Abu Salem, “Dynamic Safety Message Power Control in VANET Using PSO,” arXiv, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Mohammed El Amine Fekair, Abderrahmane Lakas, and Ahmed Korichi, “CBQoS-Vanet: Cluster-based Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for QoS Routing Protocol in VANET,” 2016 International Conference on Selected Topics in Mobile & Wireless Networking (MoWNeT), Cairo, Egypt, pp. 1-8, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Xiu Zhang, Xin Zhang, and Cheng Gu, “A Micro-Artificial Bee Colony Based Multicast Routing in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 58, pp. 213-221, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Guangyu Li, Lila Boukhatem, and Jinsong Wu, “Adaptive Quality-of-Service-Based Routing for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks with Ant Colony Optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 3249-3264, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] A.M. Oranj et al., “Routing Algorithm for Vehicular Ad Hoc Network Based on Dynamic Ant Colony Optimization,” International Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 79-83, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Joy Iong Zong Chen, and Smys Smys, “Optimized Dynamic Routing in Multimedia Vehicular Networks,” Journal of Information Technology and Digital World, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 174-182, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Gulshan Kumar et al., “Multidimensional Security Provision for Secure Communication in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Using Hierarchical Structure and End-To-End Authentication,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 46558-46567, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Steven A. Hofmeyr, and Stephanie Forrest, “Architecture for an Artificial Immune System,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 443-473, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]