Comparison of Language Learning Platforms to Choose a Suitable Platform for Korean Language Learning
Comparison of Language Learning Platforms to Choose a Suitable Platform for Korean Language Learning |
||
 |
 |
|
| © 2024 by IJETT Journal | ||
| Volume-72 Issue-5 |
||
| Year of Publication : 2024 | ||
| Author : Jacqueline Coquis-Flames, Sebastian Ramos-Cosi, Alicia Alva-Mantari |
||
| DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I5P132 | ||
How to Cite?
Jacqueline Coquis-Flames, Sebastian Ramos-Cosi, Alicia Alva-Mantari, " Comparison of Language Learning Platforms to Choose a Suitable Platform for Korean Language Learning," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 313-320, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I5P132
Abstract
This study focuses on the comparison of three Korean-language language learning platforms. In the process of acquiring a new language, various topics that require study are addressed. In today's era, with remarkable technological development, online platforms and mobile apps represent valuable resources for various purposes, including learning new languages. These tools provide organized access to relevant topics and, in many cases, incorporate gamification elements that facilitate the assimilation of concepts. Choosing the right platform is crucial when learning Korean, given its rich grammatical content that needs to be addressed to gain a clear understanding of sentence structure and conjugations. In addition, new language learning platforms were systematically analyzed in relation to their scientific production per year and CitiScore. The comparison between these three platforms was carried out by evaluating key aspects such as feature description, functionality, and comparative analysis. It is concluded that this research provides a guide that helps users identify the most suitable platform according to the skills they wish to reinforce in their Korean language learning process.
Keywords
Korean language, Online platforms, Mobile applications, Comparison.
References
[1] Malika Tilavova, “The Importance of Learning a Second Language and its Benefits for the Individual,” Journal of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 1-7, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Hye-Sook Wang, and Danielle O. Pyun, “Hallyu and Korean Language Learning: Gender and Ethnicity Factors,” The Korean Language in America, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 30-59, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Michael H. Long, and Catherine J. Doughty, The Handbook of Language Teaching, Wiley, pp. 1-824, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Burr Settles, and Brendan Meeder, “A Trainable Spaced Repetition Model for Language Learning,” Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, vol. 4, pp. 1848-1858, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Jason R. Rachels, and Amanda J. Rockinson-Szapkiw, “The Effects of a Mobile Gamification App on Elementary Students’ Spanish Achievement and Self-Efficacy,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 31, no. 1-2, pp. 72-89, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Gustavo García Botero, Frederik Questier, and Chang Zhu, “Self-Directed Language Learning in a Mobile-Assisted, Out-of-Class Context: Do Students Walk the Talk?,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 32, no. 1-2, pp. 71-97, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Behzad Tabibian et al., “Enhancing Human Learning via Spaced Repetition Optimization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116, no. 10, pp. 3988-3993, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Burr Settles, Geoffrey T. LaFlair, and Masato Hagiwara, “Machine Learning-Driven Language Assessment,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 8, pp. 247-263, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Gustavo García Botero et al., “Complementing In-Class Language Learning with Voluntary Out-of-Class MALL. Does Training in Self-Regulation and Scaffolding Make a Difference?,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1013-1039, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Terence Govender, and Joan Arnedo-Moreno, “An Analysis of Game Design Elements Used in Digital Game-Based Language Learning,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1-26, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Yigal Attali et al., “The Interactive Reading Task: Transformer-Based Automatic Item Generation,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, pp. 1-13, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Kenneth Heafield et al., “Findings of the Fourth Workshop on Neural Generation and Translation,” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1-9, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Kelsey K. James, and Richard E. Mayer, “Learning a Second Language by Playing a Game,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 669-674, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Pavel Brebera, “Microlearning in Foreign Language Courses: A Threat or a Promise?,” Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning, pp. 85-93, 2017.
[Google Scholar]
[15] Antonie Alm, and Larian M. Nkomo, “Chatbot Experiences of Informal Language Learners: A Sentiment Analysis,” International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1-15, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Jed A. Meltzer et al., “Improvement in Executive Function for Older Adults through Smartphone Apps: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Language Learning and Brain Training,” Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 150-171, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Arya D. McCarthy et al., “Jump-Starting Item Parameters for Adaptive Language Tests,” Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, Punta Cana, pp. 883-899, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Gabriel Sebastián, Ricardo Tesoriero, and Jose A. Gallud, “Automatic Code Generation for Language-Learning Applications,” IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1433-1440, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Reza Hadi Mogavi et al., “When Gamification Spoils Your Learning: A Qualitative Case Study of Gamification Misuse in a Language-Learning App,” Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, New York City, USA pp. 175-188, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] André Barros de Sales, and João Gabriel Antune, “Evaluation of Educational Games Usage Satisfaction,” 2021 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, Chaves, Portugal, pp. 1-6, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Victoria Abou-Khalil, Brendan Flanagan, and Hiroaki Ogata, “Personal Vocabulary Recommendation to Support Real Life Needs,” Artificial Intelligence in Education, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12749, pp. 18-23, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Rachel M. Roberts, Grace M. Neate, and Amanda Gierasch, “Implicit Attitudes Towards People with Visible Difference: Findings from an Implicit Association Test,” Psychology, Health & Medicine, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 352-358, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Sergio A. Zabala-Vargas et al., “Strengthening Motivation in the Mathematical Engineering Teaching Processes – A Proposal from Gamification and Game-Based Learning,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 4-19, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Ido Roll et al., “Understanding the Impact of Guiding Inquiry: The Relationship between Directive Support, Student Attributes, and Transfer of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours in Inquiry Learning,” Instructional Science, vol. 46, pp. 77-104, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Filipe Portela, “TechTeach—An Innovative Method to Increase the Students Engagement at Classrooms,” Information, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1-32, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Mesut Alptekin, and Katrin Temmen, “Gamification in an Augmented Reality Based Virtual Preparation Laboratory Training,” The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 916, pp. 567-578, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Shawn Loewen et al., “Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: A Duolingo Case Study,” ReCALL, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 293-311, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Nisfulaila Nursaqian, “The Effectiveness of Lingodeer Application Toward Students,” Tarbiyah And Teacher Faculty Islamic State University of Raden Intan Lampung, pp. 1-57, 2023.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Nathaniel Lotze, “Duolingo: Motivating Students via m-Homework,” Tesol Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Mahyudin Ritonga et al., “Duolingo: An Arabic Speaking Skills’ Learning Platform for Andragogy Education,” Education Research International, vol. 2022, pp. 1-9, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Elvis Wagner, “Duolingo English Test, Revised Version July 2019,” Language Assessment Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 300-315, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Stamatia Savvani, State-of-the-Art Duolingo Features and Applications, The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer, Cham, vol. 917, pp. 139-148, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Duy Huynh, Long Zuo, and Hiroyuki Iida, “An Assessment of Game Elements in Language-Learning Platform Duolingo,” 2018 4th International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 1-4, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Talia Isaacs et al., “Examining the Predictive Validity of the Duolingo English Test: Evidence from a Major UK University,” Language Testing, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 748-770, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Matt Kessler, “Supplementing Mobile-Assisted Language Learning with Reflective Journal Writing: A Case Study of Duolingo Users’ Metacognitive Awareness,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 36, no. 5-6, pp. 1040-1063, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Mitchell Shortt et al., “Gamification in Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: A Systematic Review of Duolingo Literature from Public Release of 2012 to Early 2020,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 517-554, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Gustavo Willians Soad, Nemésio F. Duarte Filho, and Ellen Francine Barbosa, “Quality Evaluation of Mobile Learning Applications,” 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Erie, PA, USA, pp. 1-8, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Mehran Gholizadeh et al., “Emergent Affordances and Potential Challenges of Mobile Learning Apps: Insights from Online Reviews,” Information Technology and People, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 2500-2517, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Weni Dwi Kuncaring Madya Susila, “The Lingodeer Mobile Application To Learn Mandarin,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences, Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, pp. 1-17, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] Tong Li et al., “What Apps Did You Use?: Understanding the Long-Term Evolution of Mobile App Usage,” Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 66-76, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] M.E. Ismail et al., “Implementation of the Gamification Concept Using KAHOOT! among TVET Students: An Observation,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1140, pp. 1-8, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] Ruti Gafni, Dafni Biran Achituv, and Gila Joyce Rachmani, “Learning Foreign Languages Using Mobile Applications,” Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, vol. 16, pp. 301-317, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]