Green Port Performance Criteria Model in A Sustainable Maritime Transportation System in Makassar Port

Green Port Performance Criteria Model in A Sustainable Maritime Transportation System in Makassar Port
  IJETT-book-cover           
  
© 2024 by IJETT Journal
Volume-72 Issue-2
Year of Publication : 2024
Author : Andi Ningrat, Sakti Adji Adisasmita, Sumarni Hamid Aly, Muralia Hustim
DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I2P117

How to Cite?

Andi Ningrat, Sakti Adji Adisasmita, Sumarni Hamid Aly, Muralia Hustim, "Green Port Performance Criteria Model in A Sustainable Maritime Transportation System in Makassar Port," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 154-162, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I2P117

Abstract
Maritime transport, commonly referred to as the Maritime Transportation System (MTS), encompasses ports and intermodal land connections that facilitate approximately 80% of global trade. This research aims to enhance the concept of a green port model at Makassar Port in South Sulawesi by assessing criteria for green port performance. The methodology involves constructing a green port performance model through the integration of structural equation modeling (SEM). The criteria considered for evaluating green port performance include five aspects: operational management, environmental technical considerations, financial and economic factors, social elements, and the port information system. The research findings indicate the following: (1) operational management significantly and positively influences green port performance, evidenced by a T-statistic value of 0.221 and a p-value of 0.011; (2) environmental technical aspects have a positive and significant impact on green port performance, with a T-statistic value of 0.356 and a p-value of 0.005; (3) financial-economic considerations positively and significantly affect green port performance, supported by a T-statistic value of 0.161 and a p-value of 0.044; (4) the social aspect exhibits a positive and significant correlation with green port performance, as indicated by a T-statistic value of 0.229 and a p-value of 0.016; and (5) the port information system aspect positively and significantly contributes to green port performance, with a T-statistic value of 0.244 and a p-value of 0.021. The resultant green port performance model from this research demonstrates an R-square value of 0.623 and an NFI of 0.318.

Keywords
Green port criteria, Green port performance, Makassar port, Structural equation modeling.

References
[1] Stanisław Gucma, “Conditions of Safe Ship Operation in Seaports – Optimization of Port Waterway Parameters,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 22-29, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Hüseyin Bakır et al., “Forecasting of Future Greenhouse Gas Emission Trajectory for India Using Energy and Economic Indexes with Various Metaheuristic Algorithms,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 360, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Julie Johnston, “Developing Climate Change Literacy to Combat Climate Change and its Impacts,” EGU General Assembly 2021, pp. 19-30, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Syedesmaeil Mousavi, “Performance of Non-Fired Green Brick Containing Rice Husk as Sustainable Building Material,” International Journal of Engineering, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 306-312, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Nikolaos Sifakis, and Theocharis Tsoutsos, “Planning Zero-Emissions Ports through the Nearly Zero Energy Port Concept,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 286, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Marko Sarstedt, and Jun-Hwa Cheah, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Using SmartPLS: A Software Review,” Journal of Marketing Analytics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 196-202, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Joseph F. Hair et al., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed., Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 1-384, 2022.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Nurdin Ahmadi, Tridoyo Kusumastanto, and Edy Ihut Siahaan, “Environmentally Friendly Port Development Strategy (Greenport) Case Study: Cigading Port, Indonesia,” Transportation Research Newsletter, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 9-26, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Somchint Pilouk, and Thammarat Koottatep, “Environmental Performance Indicators as the Key for Eco-Industrial Parks in Thailand,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 156, pp. 614-623, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Min Ho Ha, Zaili Yang, and Man Wook Heo, “A New Hybrid Decision Making Framework for Prioritising Port Performance Improvement Strategies,” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 105-116, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Rattaporn Teerawattana, and Yi-Chih Yang, “Environmental Performance Indicators for Green Port Policy Evaluation: Case Study of Laem Chabang Port,” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 63-69, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Martí Puig et al., “Benchmark Dynamics in the Environmental Performance of Ports,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 121, no. 1- 2, pp. 111-119, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] John Brewer, Isadore Newman, and Carolyn R. Benz, “Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum,” Contemporary Sociology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 245-246, 1999.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Felicitas Rost, “Q‐Sort Methodology: Bridging the Divide between Qualitative and Quantitative. An Introduction to an Innovative Method for Psychotherapy Research,” Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 98-106, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Yanyi K. Djamba, “Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches,” Teaching Sociology, vol. 30, no. 3, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Hoang Phuong Nguyen, Phuoc Quy Phong Nguyen, and Thanh Phuong Nguyen, “Green Port Strategies in Developed Coastal Countries as Useful Lessons for the Path of Sustainable Development: A Case Study in Vietnam,” International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 950-962, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Erica Caetano Roos, and Francisco José Kliemann Neto, “Tools for Evaluating Environmental Performance at Brazilian Public Ports: Analysis and Proposal,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 115, no. 1-2, pp. 211-216, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] H.B. Sanggoro, S.W. Alisjahbana, and D. Mohamad, “Influence of Project and Affected Local Community Interests Level on Social Conflicts in Indonesian Infrastructure Projects,” International Journal of Engineering, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1217-1226, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] H.B. Sanggoro, S.W. Alisjahbana, D. Mohamad, “Soft System Methodology: Project vs Local Community Interests in Project Social Conflict,” International Journal of Engineering, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 2107-2115, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Athanassios Ballis, and Antony Stathopoulos, “A Paradigm of Information and Operational Control in Port Management Systems,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 829-833, 1997.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Leonard Heilig, Silvia Schwarze, and Stefan Voss, “An Analysis of Digital Transformation in the History and Future of Modern Ports,” Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, pp. 1341- 1350, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Dong-Wook Song, and Photis M. Panayides, “Global Supply Chain and Port/Terminal: Integration and Competitiveness,” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 73-87, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]