Removal of Mercury Ions from Wastewater Using Different Techniques

Removal of Mercury Ions from Wastewater Using Different Techniques

  IJETT-book-cover           
  
© 2024 by IJETT Journal
Volume-72 Issue-10
Year of Publication : 2024
Author : Ho Soon Min, Subhajit Ray
DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I10P103

How to Cite?
Ho Soon Min, Subhajit Ray, "Removal of Mercury Ions from Wastewater Using Different Techniques," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 21-34, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I10P103

Abstract
Mercury ion is highly toxic and can be observed in living organisms. It is nondegradable, resulting in several diseases even at low concentrations. Wastewater treatment is very important to ensure good quality of water. Water pollution should be solved by using different techniques. Adsorption as a unit operation process is basically defined as the surface phenomenon involving the separation of materials on a solid matrix. Activated carbon (as adsorbent) will be prepared using carbonaceous materials through carbonization, and activation process. Experimental results confirmed that the obtained carbons are well-developed porosity structures with higher surface area. Adsorption equilibrium, thermodynamics, and kinetics were studied. Research findings highlighted that the adsorption capacity is strongly affected by different conditions. The percentage of removal should be improved from time to time to ensure that pollutants can be eliminated successfully.

Keywords
Wastewater treatment, Water pollution, Water purification, Water use, Activated carbon, Adsorbent.

References
[1] Binbin Wu et al., “Adsorption Characteristics of Used Granular Activated Carbon Regenerated by Ultrasonic Backwashing,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1-13, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Yiran Yan et al., “In Situ Production of Bacterial Nanocellulose-Activated Carbon Composites from Pear Juice Industry Wastewater by Two New Komagataeibacter Intermedius and Komagataeibacter Xylinus Isolates for Heavy Metal Removal,” Environmental Technology & Innovation, vol. 33, pp. 1-13, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Yuting Wang et al., “Comprehensive Carbon Footprint Analysis of Wastewater Treatment: A Case Study of Modified Cyclic Activated Sludge Technology for Low Carbon Source Urban Wastewater Treatment,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 923, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Sarah Mushtaq et al., “Utilizing Sludge-Based Activated Carbon for Targeted Leachate Mitigation in Wastewater Treatment,” Environmental Research, vol. 249, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Weichen Qin et al., “A New Approach of Simultaneous Adsorption and Regeneration of Activated Carbon to Address the Bottlenecks of Pharmaceutical Wastewater Treatment,” Water Research, vol. 252, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Zainab Y. Atiyah, Shatha K. Muallah, and Ali H. Abbar, “Removal of COD from Petroleum Refinery Wastewater by Adsorption Using Activated Carbon Derived from Avocado Plant,” South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Asya Drenkova-Tuhtan et al., “Reusable and Inductively Regenerable Magnetic Activated Carbon for Removal of Organic Micropollutants from Secondary Wastewater Effluents,” Water Research, vol. 255, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Yahnis Dago-Serry et al., “Composite Super-Adsorbents of Chitosan/Activated Carbon for the Removal of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug from Wastewaters,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1298, no. 2, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Jemal Fito Nure et al., “Adsorption of Black MNN Reactive Dye from Tannery Wastewater Using Activated Carbon of Rumex Abysinicus,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 151, pp. 1-20, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Mohammad Almadani, “Adsorption Process Modeling to Reduce COD by Activated Carbon for Wastewater Treatment,” Chemosphere, vol. 339, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Xiaodan Zhao et al., “Comparison on Molecular Transformation of Dissolved Organic Matter During Fenton and Activated Carbon Adsorption Processes for Chemical Cleaning Wastewater Treatment,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 344, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Jan Peter Van Der Hoek et al., “Bromate Removal in an Ozone - Granular Activated Carbon Filtration Process for Organic Micropollutants Removal from Wastewater,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 58, pp. 1-10, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Jayalakshmi Rajendran et al., “Methylene Blue and Methyl Orange Removal from Wastewater by Magnetic Adsorbent Based on Activated Carbon Synthesised from Watermelon Shell,” Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 317, pp. 1-11, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Xiangzhe Jiang et al., “Pilot-Scale Removal of PFAS from Chromium-Plating Wastewater by Anion Exchange Resin and Activated Carbon: Adsorption Difference between PFOS and 6:2 Fluorotelomer Sulfonate,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 481, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Mina Dolatshah et al., “Development and Modeling of an Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) System for Simultaneous Nitrogen and Carbon Removal from an Industrial Estate Wastewater,” Biotechnology Reports, vol. 41, pp. 1-16, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Marco Gottardo et al., “A Combined Treatment of Aerobic Activated Sludge and Powdered Activated Carbon: Pilot-Scale Study of Per/Polyfluoroalkyls (PFASs), Organic Matters, Chromium, and Color Removal from Tannery Wastewaters,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 55, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Juan Lv et al., “Research on Carbon and Nitrogen Removal of Tetramethylammonium Hydroxide Containing Wastewater by Combined Anaerobic/Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge Process,” Chemosphere, vol. 354, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Jingyu Duan et al., “Enhanced Granulation of Activated Sludge in an Airlift Reactor for Organic Carbon Removal and Ammonia Retention from Industrial Fermentation Wastewater: A Comparative Study,” Water Research, vol. 251, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Wen-Pei Low et al., “Adsorption of Zinc, Copper, and Iron from Synthetic Wastewater Using Watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus), Mango (Mangifera Indica L.), and Rambutan Peels (Nephelium Lappaceum L.) as Bio-Sorbents,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 386-405, 2023.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Yuyingnan Liu et al., “Study on Adsorption Properties of Modified Corn Cob Activated Carbon for Mercury Ion,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 1-22, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] M. Zabihi, A. Ahmadpour, and A. Haghighi Asl, “Removal of Mercury from Water by Carbonaceous Sorbents Derived from Walnut Shell,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 167, no. 1-3, pp. 230-236, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Seyed-Ali Sajjadi et al., “Efficient Mercury Removal from Wastewater by Pistachio Wood Wastes-Derived Activated Carbon Prepared by Chemical Activation Using a Novel Activating Agent,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 223, pp. 1001-1009, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Fatemeh Kazemi et al., “Thiol-Incorporated Activated Carbon Derived from Fir Wood Sawdust as an Efficient Adsorbent for the Removal of Mercury Ion: Batch and Fixed-Bed Column Studies,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 100, pp. 22-35, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] W.R. Knocke, and L.H. Hemphill, “Mercury (II) Sorption by Waste Rubber,” Water Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 275-282, 1981.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Fu-Shen Zhang, Jerome O. Nriagu, and Hideaki Itoh, “Mercury Removal from Water Using Activated Carbons Derived from Organic Sewage Sludge,” Water Research, vol. 39, no. 2-3, pp. 389-395, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] F. Di Natale et al., “Mercury Adsorption on Granular Activated Carbon in Aqueous Solutions Containing Nitrates and Chlorides,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 1842-1850, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] M.F. Yardim, “Removal of Mercury (II) from Aqueous Solution by Activated Carbon Obtained from Furfural,” Chemosphere, vol. 52, no. 52, pp. 835-841, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Oscar D. Caicedo Salcedo et al., “Study of Mercury [Hg(II)] Adsorption from Aqueous Solution on Functionalized Activated Carbon,” ACS Omega, vol. 6, no. 18, pp. 11849-11856, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] N. Kannan, and S. Malar, “Removal of Mercury (II) Ions by Adsorption onto Dates Nut and Commercial Activated Carbons: A Comparative Study,” Indian Journal of Chemical Technology, vol. 12, pp. 522-527, 2005.
[Google Scholar]
[30] Neda Asasian et al., “Enhanced Mercury Adsorption Capacity by Sulfurization of Activated Carbon with SO2 in a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1588-1596, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Ke Gai et al., “Impact of Mercury Speciation on its Removal from Water by Activated Carbon and Organoclay,” Water Research, vol. 157, pp. 600-609, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Rafeah Wahi, Zainab Ngaini, and Veronica Usun Jok, “Removal of Mercury, Lead and Copper from Aqueous Solution by Activated Carbon of Palm Oil Empty Fruit Bunch,” World Applied Sciences Journal, vol. 5, pp. 84-91, 2009.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Jianzhong Zhu et al., “Modifying Activated Carbon with Hybrid Ligands for Enhancing Aqueous Mercury Removal,” Carbon, vol. 47, pp. 2014-2025, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Hania Albatrni, and Hazim Qiblawey, “Evaluation of Sodium Thiosulfate Activated Carbon for High-Performance Mercury Removal from Aqueous Solutions,” Environmental Technology & Innovation, vol. 34, pp. 1-14, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] T. Budinova et al., “Characterization and Application of Activated Carbon Produced by H3PO4 and Water Vapor Activation,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 87, no. 10, pp. 899-905, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] K. Kadirvelu, “Mercury (II) Adsorption by Activated Carbon made from Sago Waste,” Carbon, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 745-752, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] C. Namasivayam, and K. Kadirvelu, “Uptake of Mercury (II) from Wastewater by Activated Carbon from an Unwanted Agricultural Solid by-Product: Coirpith,” Carbon, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 79-84, 1999.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] K. Anoop Krishnan, and T.S. Anirudhan, “Removal of Mercury(II) from Aqueous Solutions and Chlor-Alkali Industry Effluent by Steam Activated and Sulphurised Activated Carbons Prepared from Bagasse Pith: Kinetics and Equilibrium Studies,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 161-183, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] E. Ekinci, and T. Budinova, “Removal of Mercury Ion from Aqueous Solution by Activated Carbons Obtained from Biomass and Coals,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 77-78, pp. 437-443, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] M. Madhava Rao et al., “Removal of Mercury from Aqueous Solutions Using Activated Carbon Prepared from Agricultural by-Product/Waste,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 634-643, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] C. Namasivayam, and K. Periasamy, “Bicarbonate-Treated Peanut Hull Carbon for Mercury (II) Removal from Aqueous Solution,” Water Research, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1663-1668, 1993.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] Neda Asasian, Tahereh Kaghazchi, and Mansooreh Soleimani, “Elimination of Mercury by Adsorption onto Activated Carbon Prepared from the Biomass Material,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 283-289, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[43] B. Stephen Inbaraj, and N. Sulochana, “Mercury Adsorption on a Carbon Sorbent Derived from Fruit Shell of Terminalia Catappa,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 133, no. 1-3, pp. 283-290, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[44] Eka Marya Mistar, “Adsorption of Mercury(II) Using Activated Carbon Produced from Bambusa Vulgaris Var. Striata in a Fixed-Bed Column,” Sains Malaysiana, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 719-725, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[45] Mariana Mariana et al., “Nipa Palm Shell as a Sustainable Precursor for Synthesizing High-Performance Activated Carbon: Characterization and Application for Hg2+ Adsorption,” Bioresource Technology Reports, vol. 21, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[46] Ashraf M.M. Essa, Lynne E. Macaskie, and Nigel L. Brown, “A New Method for Mercury Removal,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 27, pp. 1649-1655, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[47] Matthew M. Matlock, Brock S. Howerton, and David A. Atwood, “Irreversible Precipitation of Mercury and Lead,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 73-82, 2001.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[48] Farhad Fazlollahi et al., Method for Removal of Mercury from Oil Field Brine with Calcium Carbonate Co-Precipitation, Characterization of Minerals, Metals, and Materials, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[49] Muhammad Hamid Raza et al., “Phragmites Karka as a Biosorbent for the Removal of Mercury Metal Ions from Aqueous Solution: Effect of Modification,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2015, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[50] Zhong He et al., “Removal of Mercury from Coal-Fired Flue Gas and its Sulfur Tolerance Characteristics by Mn, Ce Modified γ-Al2O3 Catalyst,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2020, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[51] Mohammad Saiful Islam et al., “Mercury Removal from Wastewater Using Cysteamine Functionalized Membranes,” ACS Omega, vol. 5, no. 35, pp. 22255-22267, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[52] Sebastián Hernández et al., “Thiol-Functionalized Membranes for Mercury Capture from Water,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 5287-5295, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[53] Yifeng Huang et al., “Removal of Mercury (II) from Wastewater by Polyvinylamine-Enhanced Ultrafiltration,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 154, pp. 1-10, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[54] Yifeng Huang et al., “Batch Process of Polymer-Enhanced Ultrafiltration to Recover Mercury (II) from Wastewater,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 514, pp. 229-240, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[55] J. Barron-Zambrano et al., “Mercury Removal and Recovery from Aqueous Solutions by Coupled Complexation-Ultrafiltration and Electrolysis,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 229, no. 1-2, pp. 179-186, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[56] Chia-Yu Wu et al., “Removal of Trace-Amount Mercury from Wastewater by Forward Osmosis,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 108-116, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[57] Dong Suk Han et al., “Reactive Iron Sulfide (FeS)-Supported Ultrafiltration for Removal of Mercury (Hg(II)) from Water,” Water Research, vol. 53, pp. 310-321, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[58] Jian Xian Zeng et al., “Selective Separation of Hg(II) and Cd(II) from Aqueous Solutions by Complexation-Ultrafiltration Process,” Chemosphere, vol. 76, pp. 706-710, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[59] Arash Tahvili et al., “New Efficient Inorganic-Organic Nanofibers Electrospun Membrane for Fluorescence Detection and Removal of Mercury (II) Ions,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1179, pp. 242-251, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[60] Meltem Urgun-Demirtas, “Achieving Very Low Mercury Levels in Refinery Wastewater by Membrane Filtration,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 215-216, pp. 98-107, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[61] Hania Albatrni, Hazim Qiblawey, and Muftah H. El-Naas, “Comparative Study between Adsorption and Membrane Technologies for the Removal of Mercury,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 257, pp. 1-15, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[62] Scott P. Bizily et al., “Phytoremediation of Methylmercury Pollution: merB Expression in Arabidopsis Thaliana Confers Resistance to Organomercurials,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 6808-6813, 1999.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[63] R. Bennicelli et al., “The Ability of Azolla Caroliniana to Remove Heavy Metals (Hg(II), Cr(III), Cr(VI)) from Municipal Waste Water,” Chemosphere, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 141-146, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[64] Ziqi He et al., “Removal of Mercury from Sediment by Ultrasound Combined with Biomass (Transgenic Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii),” Chemosphere, vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 1249-1254, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[65] Sandra Gil, Isela Lavilla, and Carlos Bendicho, “Mercury Removal from Contaminated Water by Ultrasound-Promoted Reduction/Vaporization in a Microscale Reactor,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 212-216, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[66] Sandra GilIsela, LavillaCarlos, and Bendicho, “Ultrasound-Promoted Cold Vapor Generation in the Presence of Formic Acid for Determination of Mercury by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 78, no. 17, pp. 6260-6264, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[67] Barbara Lesa et al., “Bench-Scale Tests on Ultrasound-Assisted Acid Washing and Thermal Desorption of Mercury from Dredging Sludge and Other Solid Matrices,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 171, no. 1-3, pp. 647-653, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[68] Yaning Sun et al., “Radical-Induced Oxidation Removal of Mercury by Ozone Coupled with Bromine,” ACS ES&T Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 110-116, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[69] Cheng-Yen Tsai, Tien-Ho Kuo, and Hsing-Cheng His, “Fabrication of Al-Doped TiO2 Visible-Light Photocatalyst for Low-Concentration Mercury Removal,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2012, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]