Development of Risk-based Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Standards for Integrated Design and Construction Phase on Design-Build Contract of Mechanical and Electrical Works of High-Rise Building to Improve Construction Safety Performance.
Development of Risk-based Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Standards for Integrated Design and Construction Phase on Design-Build Contract of Mechanical and Electrical Works of High-Rise Building to Improve Construction Safety Performance |
||
|
||
© 2023 by IJETT Journal | ||
Volume-71 Issue-8 |
||
Year of Publication : 2023 | ||
Author : Mariana Feronica Damanik, Yusuf Latief, Danang Budi Nugroho |
||
DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V71I8P210 |
How to Cite?
Mariana Feronica Damanik, Yusuf Latief, Danang Budi Nugroho, "Development of Risk-based Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Standards for Integrated Design and Construction Phase on Design-Build Contract of Mechanical and Electrical Works of High-Rise Building to Improve Construction Safety Performance," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 119-130, 2023. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V71I8P210
Abstract
Occupational accidents in the construction sector in Indonesia occupy the highest national ranking compared to other industries. Accidents in the construction industry frequently result from mechanical and electrical work. The technological advancements in the mechanical and electrical industries are among the quickest. Because of this, safety in construction should get special consideration. Identifying risks as early as feasible during the design phase is crucial for preventing construction accidents. However, risk analysis is not structured during development, so it only accounts for some risks requiring special attention. To produce a structured inventory of risks, a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is used to identify risks. The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) standard will be the primary input for identifying risks related to employees, equipment, materials, and the environment/public during the design and construction phase. This research provides valuable insight into the main elements that contribute to safety risk through a systematic risk analysis. This study employs a literature review, expert consultation, and qualitative risk analysis to identify the most significant risks and their associated causes, effects, and preventive and corrective actions. This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by offering a comprehensive understanding of the conception of risk-based WBS standards that integrate design and construction phases. The research findings emphasize the significance of management in improving construction safety performance. Management is responsible for developing explicit and standardized safety policies and procedures.
Keywords
Construction safety performance, Design-build, Mechanical and electrical, risk, Work breakdown structure.
References
[1] S. Wamiziri, “Safety Culture in the Construction Industry,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 167–174, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Irina Brodetskaia, Rafael Sacks, and Aviad Shapira, “A Workflow Model for Systems and Interior Finishing Works in Building Construction,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1209-1227, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Alex Albert, and Matthew R. Hallowell, “Safety Risk Management for Electrical Transmission and Distribution line Construction,” Safety Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 118-126, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] S.M. Renuka, S. Arunkumar, and C. Umarani, “Implementation of Lean Construction and its Problems on Construction Projects in India,” SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 11-19, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[5] Chia-Fen Chi, and Meng-Lin Wu, “Fatal Occupational Injuries in Taiwan - Relationship Between Fatality Rate and Age,” Safety Science, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 1997.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] J. Hinze, “Construction Safety,” Safety Science, vol. 46, no. 4, p. 565, 1997.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[7] N.N. Sarbini et al., “Key Design Issues in the Construction Project: Conceptual and Detailed Design Review Phases,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1200, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Akhmad Suraji, “Construction Accidents and the Lesson Learnt from 1000 Cases,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 41-49, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Patrick Manu et al., “Design for Occupational Safety and Health: Key Attributes for Organisational Capability,” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2614-2636, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Ebenezer Adaku, Nii A. Ankrah, and Issaka E. Ndekugri, “Design for Occupational Safety and Health: A Theoretical Framework for Organisational Capability,” Safeety Science, vol. 133, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Timothy R. Driscoll et al., “The Role of Design Issues in Work-Related Fatal Injury in Australia,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 209-214, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Michael Behm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety Concept,” Safety Science, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 589-611, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] R.A. Haslam et al., “Contributing Factors in Construction Accidents,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 401-415, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] R.T. Szymberski, “Construction Project Safety Planning: Using Construction Professionals as Safety Consultants Early in a Project’s Development can Dramatically Improve Job Safety,” Tappi Journal, vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 69-74, 1997.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Husnul Khatimi, and Muhammad Rodlin Afif, “Implementation Building Information Modeling (Bim) 5D in Development Project of The Dakwah Building Campus 2 UIN Antasari Banjarbaru,” SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 29-34, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[16] Alistair Gibb et al., “What Causes Accidents?,” Proceedings of the Institute of Civvil Engineering, vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 46-50, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] H. Lingard et al., Construction Work Health and Safety, Safety in Design.
[Publisher Link]
[18] T. Michael Toole, and John Gambatese, “The Trajectories of Prevention through Design in Construction,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 225-230, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Patrick X.W. Zou, Sonya Redman, and Steve Windon, “Case Studies on Risk and Opportunity at Design Stage of Building Projects in Australia: Focus on Safety,” Architectural Engineering and Design Management, vol. 4, no. 3-4, pp. 221-238, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] David Hillson, “Using a Risk Breakdown Structure in Project Management,” Journal of Facilities Management, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 85-97, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Danang Budi Nugroho, and Yusuf Latief, “Development of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) for Safety Planning on Tunneling Work Projects Based on Risk,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1858, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] S.V. Siva Raju et al., “Planning, Analysis & Construction Controlling of G+5 Building By Using Primavera,” SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 31-37, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[23] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung : Alfabeta, CV.
[Publisher Link]
[24] Vania Elsye, Yusuf Latief, and Leni Sagita, “Development of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Standard for Producing the Risk Based Structural Work Safety Plan of Building,” MATEC Web Conference, vol. 147, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Jaemin Jeong, and Jaewook Jeong, “Novel Approach of the Integrated Work & Risk Breakdown Structure for Identifying the Hierarchy of Fatal Incident in Construction Industry,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 41, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Helen Lingard et al., “Prevention through Design: Trade-offs in Reducing Occupational Health and Safety Risk for the Construction and Operation of a Facility,” Built Environment Project and Asset Management, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7-23, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Peter J. Edwards et al., “Identifying and Communicating Project Stakeholder Risks,” Building a Sustainable Future: Construction Research Congress, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Aksorn, T. and B. H. W. Hadikusumo. "Critical Success Factors Influencing Safety Program Performance in Thai Construction Projects." Safety Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 709-727, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]