Observational Study of Fetal Monitoring in Different Maternal Positions at More Than 3600 Masl Huancavelica, 2021

Observational Study of Fetal Monitoring in Different Maternal Positions at More Than 3600 Masl Huancavelica, 2021
  IJETT-book-cover           
  
© 2023 by IJETT Journal
Volume-71 Issue-6
Year of Publication : 2023
Author : Lina Cardenas-Pineda, Sandra Jurado-Condori, Luz Aynar-Martinez, Gabriela Ordoñez-Ccora, Leonardo Leyva-Yataco, Michael Cieza-Terrones, Alicia Alva Mantari
DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V71I6P207

How to Cite?

Lina Cardenas-Pineda, Sandra Jurado-Condori, Luz Aynar-Martinez, Gabriela Ordoñez-Ccora, Leonardo Leyva-Yataco, Michael Cieza-Terrones, Alicia Alva Mantari, "Observational Study of Fetal Monitoring in Different Maternal Positions at More Than 3600 Masl Huancavelica, 2021," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 54-65, 2023. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V71I6P207

Abstract
This research aims to determine the effect of maternal left lateral decubitus and Fowler positions on electronic fetal monitoring at more than 3600 Masl-Huancavelica, 2021. Method: the research was pre-experimental, prospective, and longitudinal analytical; the level of research is explanatory; normality was evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilk statistician and statistical analysis with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test sample: 35 pregnant women between 32 and 42 weeks. Each one underwent two NST of 20 minutes (LLD and Fowler). Results: the average age was 25 years old and a mean of 37.26 weeks of gestational age; 37.1% were primigravida, 42.9% second gestation and 20% multiple gestations; in the NST in the LLD position, it was found: that 91.4% reactivity, 8.6% non-reactive, there were no pathological, while in the Fowler position: 74.3% presented reactivity, 20.0% non-reactive and 5.7% pathological. The baseline in LLD was 136.06, compared to 139.31 in Fowler. The mean of variability and accelerations was 10.51 and 4.49 in LLD and 9.63 and 3.43 in Fowler; few NSTs were identified with mild variable decelerations of 0.34 and 0.09, and fetal movements were 13.11 and 10.40, respectively. There is a significant difference in the baseline, showing less in LLD (“p” value 0.000). Conclusions: The LLD position shows better results than the non-stress test; a significant difference has been found in the baseline, while the variability, acceleration and movements are similar in both positions with a significance of 0.05.

Keywords
Non-Stress Test (NST), Left Lateral Decubitus position (LLD), Fowler's position, Fetal Heart Rate (FHR).

References
[1] James J. Arnold, and Breanna L. Gawrys, “Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring,” American Family Physician, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 158–167, 2020.
[Publisher Link]
[2] C. Garabedian et al., “Understanding Fetal Physiology and Second Line Monitoring during Labor,” Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics Human Reproduction, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 113–117, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Gary F. Cunningham, Williams Obstetricia 24th Edition, Ediciones Journal - Libros Profesionales Para La Salud, 2015.
[Publisher Link]
[4] Rosalie M. Grivell et al., “Antenatal Cardiotocography for Fetal Assessment,” Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Maria F. Hurtado-Sánchez et al., “Characteristics of Heart Rate Tracings in Preterm Fetus,” Medicina, vol. 57, no. 6, p. 528, May 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Peter Renou, Warwich Newman, and Carl Wood, “Autonomic Control of Fetal Heart Rate,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 949–953, 1969.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Y. Sorokin et al., “The Association between Fetal Heart Rate Patterns and Fetal Movements in Pregnancies between 20- and 30-weeks’ Gestation,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 243–249, 1982.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] T. Wheeler, and A. Murrills, “Patterns of Fetal Heart Rate during Normal Pregnancy,” An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 1978.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Peter Van Leeuwen et al., “Increase in Regularity of Fetal Heart Rate Variability with Age,” Biomedical Technology(Berl), 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Ely B. Nathan et al., “The Relationship of Maternal Position to the Results of Brief Nonstress Tests: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 182, no. 5, pp. 1070–1072, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Heba A. Ibrahim, Wafaa T. Elgzar, and Elham A. R. Saied, “The Effect of Different Positions during Non-stress Test on Maternal Hemodynamic Parameters, Satisfaction, and Fetal Cardiotocographic Patterns,” African Journal of Reproductive Health, vol. 25, no. 1, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Merlinda Aluş et al., “The Effects of Different Maternal Positions on Non-stress Test: An Experimental Study,” Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 562–568, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Peter R. Stone et al., “Effect of Maternal Position on Fetal Behavioural State and Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Late Gestation Pregnancy,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 595, no. 4, pp. 1213–1221, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Giuseppe Cito et al., “Maternal Position during Non-stress Test and Fetal Heart Rate Patterns,” Acta Obstetricia Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 335–338, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Salime Mucuk, and Tulay Bülbül, “Effects of Position on Non-stress Test Results and Maternal Satisfaction,” Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 30, no. 11, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Susan Blackburn, Maternal, Fetal, & Neonatal Physiology, 5th Edition, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2017.
[Publisher Link]
[17] Anthony M. Carter, “Placental Gas Exchange and the Oxygen Supply to the Fetus,” Comprehensive Physiology, vol. 5, no. 3, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] D.I. Edelstone, A.M. Rudolph, and M.A. Heymann, “Liver and Ductus Venosus Blood Flows in Fetal Lambs in Utero,” Circulation Research, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 426–433, 1978.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Claudia M. Cannizzaro, and Miguel A. Paladino, “Physiology and Pathophysiology of Neonatal Adaptation,” Anesthesia Analgesia Reanimation, vol. 24, no. 2, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Chester B. Martin, “Normal Fetal Physiology and Behavior, and Adaptive Responses with Hypoxemia,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 239–242, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Ivana Bulatovic et al., “Human Fetal Cardiac Progenitors: The Role of Stem Cells and Progenitors in the Fetal and Adult Heart,” Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 31, pp. 58–68, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Anna Finnemore, and Alan Groves, “Physiology of the Fetal and Transitional Circulation,” Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 210–216, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Sarah U Morton and Dara Brodsky, “Fetal Physiology and the Transition to Extrauterine Life,” Clinics in Perinatology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 395–407, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Stephanie Pildner von Steinburg et al., “What is the ‘Normal’ Fetal Heart rate?,” Peer Journal, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] N. Manassiev et al., “What is the Normal Heart Rate of a Term Fetus?,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 442–444, 1998.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] L.C. Roura, Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Panamerican Medical Editorial, 2007.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Álvarez Vázquez, “Some Notes on the History of Electronic Fetal Monitoring for Cardiological Follow-up,” Medical Humanities, 2010.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] E. Chandraharan et al., “Guide to Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring based on Pathophysiology,” Physiological CTG Interpretation, 2018.
[Publisher Link]
[29] Maternal Fetal Monitoring - The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Health Care Physicians, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.studocu.com/pe/document/universidad-catolica-santo-toribio-de-mogrovejo/gineco-obstericia/monitoreo-materno-fetal/25920155
[30] Renato Natale, Constance Nasello-Paterson, and Robert Turliuk, “Longitudinal Measurements of Fetal Breathing, Body Movements, Heart Rate, and Heart Rate Accelerations and Decelerations at 24 to 32 Weeks of Gestation,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 256–263, 1985.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] G. Boog, “Maternal Determination of Fetal Movements. A Sure and Simple Method of Monitoring the Pregnancy,” Revue Francaise de Gynecologie et D'Obstetrique, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 693–695, 1988.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Erica O’Neill, and John Thorp, “Antepartum Evaluation of the Fetus and Fetal Wellbeing,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 722–730, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Ayi Tansah Rohaeti et al., “Hypnotherapy as an Alternative to Reducing Anxiety Levels, Cortisol Levels and Fetal Heart Rate Among Primigravide in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy,” SSRG International Journal of Nursing and Health Science, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 5-7, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[34] S. A. Sorrentino, L. N. Remmert, and B. Gorek, Mosby’s Essentials for Nursing Assistants, 4th Edition, 2010.
[35] Peter Tamás et al., “Effects of Maternal Central Hemodynamics on Fetal Heart Rate Patterns,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 711–714, 2007.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Diogo Ayres-de-Campos, “Electronic Fetal Monitoring or Cardiotocography, 50 Years Later: What’s in a Name?,” American Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology, vol. 218, no. 6, pp. 545–546, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Carl V. Smith, and Richard H. Paul, “2 Antepartum Cardiotocography,” Baillieres Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 1987.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Daniel Michael, Fundamentals of Obstetrics (SEGO) Iglesias Guiu J Martín Jiménez A, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/38043200/Fundamentos_de_Obstetricia_SEGO_Iglesias_Guiu_J_Mart%C3%ADn_Jim%C3%A9nez_A
[39] Alaa Marouf, Firas Hussein, and Louai Hasan, “Analytical Study of Thrombocytopenia in Pregnant Women in Tishreen University Hospital (Causes, Complications, Management),” SSRG International Journal of Medical Science, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 9-13, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[40] M. Lakshmi Priyanka Devi, T. Ravi Kumar, and Girish Kumar PVR, “An Enhanced Fall Detection System for Elderly Person Monitoring using Consumer Home Networks,” SSRG International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 19-22, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[41] “Fundamentos De Obstetricia (Sego) Pdf,” Fundamentos De Obstetricia (Sego) Pdf ~ Sommerlyspdf Los Mejores Libros De Medicina, infolibros, bookmedicos.
[42] Cara C. Heuser, “Physiology of Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 607–615, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[43] Jorge Hernan Gutiérrez, Jader de Jesus Gómez, and Hernan Arturo Cortés, Obstetricia: Aspectos Claves, Corporation for Biological Research CIB, 2015.
[Google Scholar]
[44] R. Hernández Sampieri, C. Fernández Collado, and M. del Pilar Baptista Lucio, Metodología de la Investigación, 5th Edition, 2022.
[45] Seminarios de Investigacion Cientifica: Metodologia de La Investigacion Para Las Ciencias de La Salud: Jose Supo: 9781477449042. [Online]. Available: https://www.bookdepository.com/es/Seminarios-de-Investigacion-Cientifica-Metodologia-de-La-Investigacion-Para-Las-Ciencias-de-La-Salud-Jose-Supo/9781477449042
[46] R. Hernández Sampieri, and C. Fernández Collado, Research Methodology, Sixth Edition, McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.
[Publisher Link]
[47] EOC, Basic Medical Examination Positions, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://eoc.cat/posiciones-de-exploracion-medica/
[48] G. R. Enrique et al., “Guidelines for Clinical Practice and Procedures in Obstetrics and Perinatology National Maternal Perinatal Institute,” National Maternal Perinatal Institute, Lima, 2018.