Evaluating the Impact of a Comprehensive Technical Building Survey using a Cultural Heritage Site as an Example

Evaluating the Impact of a Comprehensive Technical Building Survey using a Cultural Heritage Site as an Example
  IJETT-book-cover           
  
© 2023 by IJETT Journal
Volume-71 Issue-6
Year of Publication : 2023
Author : Yana Shesterikova, Tembot Bidov, Rustam Fatullaev, Darya Elnikova
DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V71I6P201

How to Cite?

Yana Shesterikova, Tembot Bidov, Rustam Fatullaev, Darya Elnikova, "Evaluating the Impact of a Comprehensive Technical Building Survey using a Cultural Heritage Site as an Example," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1-7, 2023. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V71I6P201

Abstract
A comprehensive survey of the technical condition of buildings (structures) makes it possible to assess the actual values of the monitored parameters that characterise the serviceability of structures and elements and to predict their reliability and safety in the future. The purpose of the study is to prove that a qualitatively performed comprehensive survey of the technical condition of buildings (structures) is necessary for further reliability and safety of the operation of buildings (structures). The article is based on the assessment of complex inspection of the technical condition of buildings and structures on the example of the object of the cultural heritage of a regional destination - a lodging house located at 3 Malaya Dmitrovka Street, Moscow. It is established that the revealed defects and damages testify to the category of the technical condition of the building as limited operational. The article formulates recommendations for the elimination of the identified defects and damages.

Keywords
Due diligence, Technical condition, Construction, Cultural heritage.

References
[1] Riza Yosia Sunindijo et al., “Modelling Service Quality in the Construction Industry,” International Journal of Business Performance Management, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 262-276, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] A. Czajkowska, and M. Kadłubek, “Management of Factors Affecting Quality of Processes in Construction Enterprises,” Polish Journal of Management Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 28-38, 2015.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] P. P. Oleinik, and V. I. Brodsky, “Organization of Pre-Project Inspection of the Technical Condition of Reconstructed Industrial Buildings and Structures,” System Technologies, vol. 3, no. 32, pp. 5-7, 2022.
[4] A. V. Zhivenko, B. V. Pozhidaev, and V. A. Zhivenko, “Typical Design Errors Detected during Surveys of Buildings and Structures,” Occupational Safety in Industry, vol. 1, pp. 72-74, 2016.
[5] I. Yu. Petrova, and O. O. Mostovoy, “Review of the Process of Conducting a Survey of Buildings and Structures, Problems and Solutions,” Engineering and Construction Bulletin of the Caspian Sea, vol. 1, no. 35, pp. 69-75, 2021.
[6] E.I. Shmagin et al., "Inspection and Monitoring of Technical Condition of Building Structures and Engineering Equipment of Buildings and Structures," 2019.
[7] Zheldakov D. Yu, “Assessment of the Technical Condition of Residential Buildings on the Serviceability of Engineering Communications and Equipment,” BST: Bulletin of Construction Engineering, no. 1, no. 1049, 2022.
[8] I. Yu. Pimshin, and T. M. Pimshina, “Determination of Technical Condition of Operating Buildings for Further Monitoring and Development of Recommendations to Restore Operational Reliability,” Transport: Science, Education, Production: Collection of Scientific Papers of International Scientific-Practical Conference, Rostov-on-Don, vol. 2, pp. 18-21, 2017.
[9] V.V. Ledenev, and V.P. Yartsev, Inspection and Monitoring of Building Structures of Buildings and Structures, 2017.
[10] D.S. Vorobyev, "Technical Assessment of Buildings and Structures," 2015.
[11] A. N. Kulikov et al., Inspection of Buildings and Structures, Federal Agency for Education, Volgograd State Architectural and Construction University, Volzhsky Institute of Construction and Technology, Volgograd State Architectural and Construction University, 2010.
[12] Ayodeji Oke, Clinton Aigbavboa, and Ernest Dlamini, “Factors Affecting Quality of Construction Projects in Swaziland,” Proceedings of the Conference on Construction in the 21st Century CITC-9, 2017.
[Google Scholar] 
[13] Fahimeh Allahi, Lucia Cassettari, and Marco Mosca, “Stochastic Risk Analysis and Cost Contingency Allocation Approach for Construction Projects Applying Monte Carlo Simulation,” Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, vol. 1, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] V. S. Abrashitov, A. N. Zhukov, and D. A. Bulavina, “The Significance of the Examination of the Conditions of Load-Bearing Structures of the Frame of Buildings and Structures,” Proceedings of the Effective Building Structures: Theory and Practice, Collection of Articles of the XXI International Scientific and Technical Conference, pp. 10-14, 2021.
[15] GOST 31937-2011, Buildings and Structures, Rules for Inspection of Load-Bearing Building Structures of Buildings and Structures, 2014.
[16] Panagiotis Douros, "Cultural Heritage Management for Sustainable Economic Growth, Guided by the Basic Principles of Local Democracy: The European Perception of the Current Affairs Committee for Approval at its Meeting in 2020 and its Policy in the Decade," SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 100-103, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[17] SP 20.13330.2016, Loads and Impacts, Revised Edition of SNiP 2.01.07-85* (as amended N 1, 2), Standratinform, Mosow, Russia, 2018.
[18] MDS 13-20.2004, Comprehensive Guidelines for Inspection and Energy Audit of Buildings under Reconstruction, Design Manual OAO “CNIIP Promzdaiy,” Moscow, Russia, 2004.
[19] SP 70.13330.2012, Bearing and Enclosing Structures, Revised Edition of SNiP 3.03.01-87 (as amended No. 1 and 3), Gosstroy, Moscow, Russia, 2013.
[20] SP 63.13330.2018, Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures, General Provisions, Standratinform, Moscow, Russia, 2019.
[21] GOST R 21.101-2020, National Standard of the Russian Federation, System of Design Documentation for Construction, Basic Requirements for Design and Working Documentation, Standratinform, Moscow, Russia, 2020.
[22] SP 13-102-2003, Rules for Inspection of Bearing Building Structures of Buildings and Constructions, Gosstroy, Moscow, Russia, 2003.
[23] GOST 18105-2018, Concretes, Rules for Strength Control and Assessment, Standratinform, Moscow, Russia, 2019.
[24] GOST 22690-2015, Concretes, Determination of Strength by Mechanical Methods of Non-Destructive Testing, Standratinform, Moscow, Russia, 2019.
[25] GOST 17624-2012, Concretes, Ultrasonic Method of Determination of Strength, Standratinform, Moscow, Russia, 2014.
[26] GOST 24992-2014, Construction of Masonry, Method for Determination of Bonding Strength in Masonry, Standratinform, Moscow, Russia, 2015.
[27] GOST 22904-93, Concrete Structures, Magnetic Method for Determination of Thickness of Concrete Protective Layer and Rebar Location, Gosstroy, Moscow, Russia, 1995.
[28] Classifier of Main Types of Defects in Construction and Building Materials Industry.
[29] SP 22.13330.2016, Foundations of Buildings and Structures, Updated Edition of SNiP 2.02.01-83* (with Amendments N 1, 2, 3), Standratinform, Moscow, Russia, 2017.
[30] GOST R 55567-2013, Procedure for Organizing and Conducting Engineering Research on Cultural Heritage Sites, Standratinform, Moscow, Russia, 2014.
[31] SP 28.13330.2017, Protection of Building Structures Against Corrosion, Revised Edition of SNiP 2.03.11-85, Standratinform, Moscow, Russia, 2017.
[32] I.A. Dudka et al., Methods of Experimental Mycology, Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1982.
[33] RVSN 20-01-2006, Saint Petersburg (TSN-20-303-2006 Saint Petersburg), "The Protection of Building Structures, Buildings and Structures against Aggressive Chemical and Biological Effects of the Environment," Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2006.